AAPS Main Site
American Association of Plastic Surgeons
Meeting
Home
Accreditation
Information
Registration
Information
Program &
Abstracts
Housing
Information
Exhibitors &
Sponsors
Travel & Visa
Information
Past & Future
Meetings

Back to 2017 Program


Comprehensive 13-Year Review of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Is Total Muscle Coverage or Alloderm Human Dermal Matrix Better?
Simon Ivey, MD1, Hamid Abdollahi, MD2, Fernando A. Herreram, M.D.1, Eric I. Chang, M.D.2.
1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA, 2Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

PURPOSE: Prosthetic breast reconstruction is the most common method in the treatment of patients undergoing mastectomy. The use of Alloderm has become more popular in implant-based breast reconstruction
METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing prosthetic breast reconstruction between 2002 and 2013. Patient demographics, fill volumes, number of expansions, costs, complications, and revisions were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 277 patients underwent placement of 466 breast tissue expanders. Although the total overall complication rate was not significantly different between the Alloderm and Total Muscle (TM) groups (31.4% vs. 21.5%, p>0.05), the rate of major complications was significantly higher with Alloderm (26.7% vs. 11.7%, p<.004). The mean initial fill volume was significantly lower in TM compared to Alloderm group (54±47 vs. 167±139, p=0.00003) resulting in a higher number of expansions in patients with total muscle coverage (7.7 vs. 6.1, p=0.00076). However, there was no difference in time to exchange for permanent implant (160.4 vs. 165.8 days, p>0.05). There is also an increased rate of revisions with Alloderm after average follow-up of 55.7 months (10.7% vs. 4.4%, p<0.01). Use of Alloderm added a mean cost of $2,217 for each breast.
CONCLUSION: Although the use of Alloderm allows increased initial fill volumes and fewer total expansions, this study shows an increased risk of major complications as well as considerable added cost without the touted benefits of decreasing revisions or time to expander exchange. Total muscle coverage remains an excellent option for providing quality breast reconstruction without increased complications.


Back to 2017 Program


Capital Building Restaurant Penny Backer Bridge Austin Skyline